by Necalli Ollin
When an incarcerated individual serving a life sentence for a homicide offense appears before a Parole Board for a public hearing, it is common for prosecutors to rely on a predictable tactic to oppose their release.
Rather than evaluate objective facts, prosecutors often baselessly claim that the person seeking release is a “sociopath” or “manipulative.” These labels are so loosely thrown around during public hearings when considering incarcerated individuals’ applications for commutations of sentence that they have become standard soundbites. The derogatory terms are intended to weaponize fear, appeal to emotion, and attempt to block a person’s release from prison, regardless of how many decades have passed or how deeply an individual has transformed.
This strategy is an antiquated and unserious argument that makes a mockery of the criminal legal system. The term “sociopath” is not an official medical diagnosis in modern psychiatry, yet prosecutors use it as a rhetorical monster-mask to dehumanize incarcerated individuals. It seeks to frame the individual as permanently dangerous and incapable of human growth.
Similarly, calling an incarcerated person “manipulative” is designed to create an inescapable trap. If an incarcerated person breaks rules, prosecutors argue it is proof of potentially dangerous behavior. But if that same person earns a college degree, helps others, leads conflict resolution initiatives, and follows the rules, prosecutors claim that good behavior is merely a calculated show to trick the system or gain opportunities. This goal of this strategy aims to convince Parole Boards and the public that an incarcerated individual has not changed, because positive achievements are portrayed as a form of deception.
IGNORING THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF EDUCATION
The claim that nearly four decades of education and completed rehabilitative programming, along with community service and other altruistic behavior, should fall under the heading of manipulation is a claim utterly divorced from reality. True manipulation is short-lived, selfish, and superficial; it cannot be faked or maintained continuously over nearly thirty-eight years inside a harsh prison environment. Genuine personal growth requires daily discipline, deep self-reflection, emotional maturity, and a moral commitment to helping others. To dismiss decades of hard work and public service as a trick is intellectually dishonest and strips away the human capacity for redemption.
This argument is particularly illogical when applied to Efrén Paredes Jr., who is currently seeking a sentence commutation from Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Efrén was incarcerated in 1989 at just fifteen years old. He is now 53 years old and has spent 70 percent of his entire life behind bars. Despite his lengthy incarceration, he has refused to let his environment define his potential or erase his humanity.
According to information documented in his prison record, and on https://EfrensWords.home.blog, Efrén’s life has been defined by consistent self-improvement, academic excellence, and public service. He has also engaged in therapy and actively worked to improve prison communities. Today, he is an undergraduate student in his senior year pursuing a Bachelor of Liberal Arts degree from Western Michigan University’s Higher Education for the Justice-Involved (HEJI) program where he is majoring in Interdisciplinary Studies. He is also a social justice changemaker, racial justice and conflict resolution advocate, and he works to empower marginalized communities.
Learning is a process that reshapes how we think, how we understand ourselves, and how we make choices. When someone learns, their mind is actively building new pathways, new habits, and new ways of seeing the world. The ability to learn is the doorway to becoming a stronger, wiser, and more responsible version of ourselves. When someone learns a new skill, they are literally changing the structure of their brain. They are building new pathways that help them think differently, and behave differently.
Some people argue that individuals who have made mistakes — especially serious ones — cannot grow. They say that a person’s past defines their future. But this argument ignores what we know about human development. People change as they age, when they face challenges, and when they receive guidance, support, or education. They also change when they reflect on their choices and decide to do better. People who believe change is impossible often only focus on the mistakes. But a mistake is a moment, not a lifetime. A person’s character is shaped over years, not seconds.
According to Linda Ross Meyer, “People do not exist in an eternal moment … they are constantly changing their minds, projecting new actions into the world, learning and growing. We cannot reduce them to one moment only, to one crime or one good deed.” (“Forgiveness and the Public Trust,” 27 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1515, 1539 (2000)). Behavioral experts have also found no evidence exists that personality ever ceases to change during a person’s lifetime. (Avshalom Caspi & Brent W. Roberts, “Personality Development Across the Life Course,” 21 Psychol. Inquiry 49, 51 (2001)).
Efrén’s life embodies the truth that “identity development never ceases: the persons adolescents will become are not the persons they will remain. The process of self-identification and redefinition lasts a lifetime.” (Mihailis E. Diamantis, “Limiting Identity in Criminal Law,” 60 B.C. L. Rev. 2011, 2077 (2019)). When someone spends years learning, practicing new skills, and reflecting on their choices, it is inaccurate to say they cannot change. Every person is constantly learning, growing, and changing throughout their lifespan. It is a natural part of being human.
RISK ASSESSMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING TELL REAL STORY
Claims made by prosecutors in the past that Efrén is “manipulative” or a “sociopath” are directly contradicted by hard scientific evidence and objective data. To determine whether an incarcerated individual poses a threat to public safety, state corrections departments rely on validated scientific evaluations. Actuarial risk assessment instruments have been found to outperform human judgment in virtually all decision-making situations. In recent years, qualified Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) staff have administered multiple standardized psychological tests to measure Efrén’s risk, personality traits, and readiness for society, and every single evaluation disproves fear-mongering.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Measures personality traits and mental health conditions. This test showed that Efrén possesses moralistic thinking, sincerity, and high social responsibility, while valuing agreeableness, trust, and a desire to avoid conflict. The results also indicate he is receptive to treatment and wants to work on himself. The MMPI-2 is highly reliable and well-represented in the peer-reviewed literature.
Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS): Assesses dynamic risk factors and personal strengths to gauge rehabilitation and safety. This actuarial risk assessment revealed that Efrén’s overall risk index is low, showing that he regulates anger effectively, has few treatment and supervision needs, and he has greater strengths and fewer risks than 94 percent of incarcerated individuals.
Transition Accountability Plan (TAP) and COMPAS: Tracks institutional progress, educational achievements, and overall behavioral compliance; and evaluates risk levels regarding violent behavior and potential reoffending. His MDOC Transition Accountability Plan, and Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternatives Sanctions evaluations confirm his low risk of violence, recidivism, and supervision needs.
Recent Psychological Evaluation: A thorough psychological evaluation administered just a few months ago by a qualified MDOC social worker confirmed that Efrén is mentally stable, emotionally grounded, exhibits no antisocial thinking or behavior, and poses no danger to the public.
(Efrén provided this writer with copies of all his psychological evaluations and actuarial risk assessment test results referenced in this writing and consented to sharing them publicly.)
DECIDING EFREN’S FUTURE BASED ON FACTS, NOT FEAR
Efrén exemplifies the exact transformation executive clemency was created to recognize. He merits the opportunity for a sentence commutation because he has proven his transformation through consistent, positive actions. A commutation of sentence granted by the Governor is a constitutional power that recognizes human redemption. It is a tool of justice and mercy that corrects sentences when continued incarceration no longer serves the public interest.
In its historic 2012 Miller v. Alabama ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that the one and only reason a minor convicted of a homicide offense can receive a life without parole sentence is if they are permanently incorrigible. The ruling was made retroactive and applicable to sentences previously final like Efrén’s in 2016. Permanent incorrigibility is defined as a person being forever incapable of change and rehabilitation. Said another way, every moment of every day for the rest of a person’s life they will never be able to change regardless of maturity, education, rehabilitative programming, therapy, or any other factor. Individuals who demonstrate capacity for change and rehabilitation must receive a term of years sentence which allows them to rejoin society one day.
Efrén’s extensive body of work and catalog of accomplishments spanning nearly four decades demonstrate he does not meet the permanently incorrigible by any rational stretch of the imagination. It is one of the reasons why in 2023, Deborah LaBelle, Director of the ACLU of Michigan Juvenile Life Without Parole Initiative, referred to Efrén as the “poster child” for individuals sentenced to life without parole when they were minors who deserves a meaningful opportunity to return to society. Many other individuals who have come to know Efrén and followed his journey over many years agree with LaBelle. They include psychologists, attorneys, clergy, professors, researchers, social workers, various current and former elected officials and MDOC staff, and countless ordinary citizens and community leaders from all walks of life.
Since 2016, almost all other individuals in Michigan who were sentenced to life without parole for offenses committed as minors have been resentenced to a term of years or released, maintaining an extraordinarily low recidivism rate of less than one percent. Evaluating Efrén based on facts, objective MDOC psychological testing, and decades of positive change and service shows that he is a peaceful, reformed individual who fully merits a commutation of his sentence. Refusing to release a person who entered prison as a child, has been incarcerated for an entire generation, consistently demonstrates growth and transformation, and poses no danger to public safety is a waste of taxpayer dollars.
Granting Efrén a commutation of sentence is the logical, fair, and humane decision to make based on empirical facts, rather than character attacks and political theater designed to incite fear.
(Michigan residents who wish to express their support for Efrén’s commutation of sentence can do so by sending the Honorable Governor Gretchen Whitmer an email using a digital action created by Amnesty International USA. Please also share the link across every network you touch and invite others to sign the action and share it widely. The action link can be accessed here: https://amnesty.quorum.us/campaign/158629/.)


